The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. Pevos (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atara (genus)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a misspelling of Rapala arata. No sources, no links. Pevos (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Redirect No, it's really Atara, which the Natural History Museum states is a genus of Lycaenidae, Zhdanko 1996. Citation added. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Chiswick Chap's reference seems to demonstrate that it is indeed a genus. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

However, it seems to be one of a number of synonyms of Rapala (butterfly) (genus) so a Redirect seems to be in order. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw, I've found Atara arata (Bremer, 1861) in this source --Pevos (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And since that confirms that that species is certainly a synonym of Rapala arata, we should redirect the genus to Rapala forthwith. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have inserted a text User:Dysmorodrepanis wrote (see diff) in the disambiguation page of Atara. So we could keep it as a kind of "informed redirect". --Pevos (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Super. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.