The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Athiratha Maharatha

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N, WP:V and the article is mainly relying on unreliable references i.e. Wordpress. CutestPenguin (Talk) 11:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CutestPenguin (Talk) 11:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CutestPenguin (Talk) 12:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kannada:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Athiratha Maharatha Perala

Really? *As it appears this brand new article can be sourced away from wordpress, why not simply tag it for issues and let them be addressed over time and through regular editing? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It still lacks significant coverage! And I think ಅತಿರಥ ಮಹಾರಥ mean HK Maharatha which is different from the title of the article. CutestPenguin (Talk) 05:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So ಅತಿರಥ ಮಹಾರಥ may apparently translate as HK Maharatha. So what? Did you ask the article creator about it? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MichaelQSchmidt: First of all I am sorry for arguing with very few edits in credit. I respect senior editors and even minors too. My concern was, the was article was failing WP:V and was referenced from unreliable reference. CutestPenguin (Talk) 11:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (message) @ 20:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.