The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Were it not for CHRISSYMAD's explicit argument against a redirect, I might have invoked WP:ATD, but given the existing discussion, I can't see calling that the consensus. If somebody wants to create the redirects on their own, this close should not be taken as an impediment to do so. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantica SuperSplash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three non-notable rollercoasters. All fail WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 13:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loopen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extreme Rusher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conment - Why is it China-related? STSC (talk) 07:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

STSC; due to Extreme Rusher being located in China, hence the tags also for Norway and Germany for the other two. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 04:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All the articles are one-line blurbs sourced from RCDB and there's no sign of other coverage. In the future, these nominations should probably be done in separate AfDs. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. No indication of notability via independent sources. Also, I think it is common enough to place articles that have one or more elements in common to place these in one AfD. For example, these are all related to one company, and there is no indication of notability for any of them. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the corresponding amusement park articles per WP:ATD-R. Lack of notability does not negate that these are potential search terms. Regards So Why 14:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per SoWhy Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Power~enwiki. Subject completely fails WP:GNG so a redirect would be inappropriate. There is no substantial coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG applies to articles, not redirects. For example, Romeo Beckham is not notable, but is still a blue link. Same for The Beatles vs. the Third Reich (yes, that's real!) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Well just because it exists doesn't mean it should. I'd expect an admin to know better. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.