The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Four Square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Unreferenced playground game that has the hallmarks of being WP:MADEUP. Someone has removed some of the more obvious indicators of madeup-ness (e.g. personal names) but with nothing more added all that is left is unremarkable. role^player 11:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-- has very little content that's not already covered at Four square. --E♴ (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Parts of it are copied from Four square anyway. The main difference seems to be the type of ball used, but that is stated as a variable. Peridon (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.