The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avon Junkies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no real notability shown for this band. lacks charting, awards. releases not on "important label". coverage is limited to local interest pieces, nothing significant. nothing satisfying WP:MUSIC duffbeerforme (talk) 12:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Appears to be zero coverage outside of one local rag, silive.com, and its associated weekly "Advance Weekly Entertainment". Albums are self published, not actually on any notable indie label, so it looks like no criteria of WP:BAND has been met. May have to consider salting at one point, as the article was recreated after the first AfD's deletion result, but apparently no one was looking. :/ Tarc (talk) 13:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.