The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 14:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awaken[edit]

Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. Hoponpop69 17:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 07:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Despite the fact I don't speak any of the non-English languages listed in the sources section, and some of them are irrelevent/unreliable, I think the links provided confer notability. Could do with a cleanup though- I don't think there is any reason for it to be continually referred to as 'AWAKEN', non of the sources shout it. J Milburn 09:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per little traces of notability. Eaomatrix 11:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per my original comments. Hoponpop69 17:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Enough references to let it in Wikipedia. Belgian bands have their own popularity that make them a source of searches in Wikipedia. Thanks for replacing it into the right context. 1st of May, 2007.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.237.141.8 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.