The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk)  · @708  ·  16:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Axialent (consulting firm)[edit]

Axialent (consulting firm) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The references in the article are only to the company's own websites, and I have been able to find few external references and none of any substance. The page was mostly edited by an unacceptable user User:Axialent, which appears to have been removed; now it is being edited by a user which has only just been created and has not edited any other pages, which suggests - but does not prove - that there is still a Conflict of Interest ColinFine (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete. Probable WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article does little more than toot the company horn. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, obvious advertising: ...focuses on the human dimension of business and works with organizations to align their culture and behaviors with their business strategies and values. Yes, but what do you do for a living? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, reads just like their website. sashankita. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashankita (talk • contribs) 07:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.