The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete - not notable. — RHaworth (talk·contribs) 12:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails to establish Notability. References consist of listings. No in-depth or non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 11:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: This article is use fake information from blog. Kyal Sin Sita (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not a role that confers an automatic WP:NPOL pass just for existing, but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources — 75 per cent of them being his own blog — that cannot support notability under WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.