The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B-Boy London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ther's a lot of prose there, but not much which really explains why he's notable. And this article has been here for almost two years, entirely unsourced. No BLP should be sitting here that long without reliable sources. Corvus cornix_talk 21:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Maybe there is/was a local noteability (local TV progamme) but the tone the articel is written disqualifies it for an encyclopedia. This amount of claims and name dropping without sources (Rock and Roll Hall of Fame ...), that is only boasting. A look in the eldest versions of the article brings the designation dance cameo. He is not mentioned as a member of the New York City Breakers even.--Ben Ben (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.