The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to User:Classicintl/BFF: Best Friends Forever (2014 film), to be worked on until more reliable sources are found.. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BFF: Best Friends Forever (2014 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon? As of yet it seems unnotable-only evidence is on Facebook. Wgolf (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categorized into Upcoming films. The movie seems evident in online and print media of the country. The article has well citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classicintl (talk • contribs) 18:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I just saw the FB link-still I am unfamiliar with that culture and I couldn't find any film sites from the US with any evidence of the film-and since many unfilmed American big films often get this, I think possibly a wait till it gets closer to release would be the best.

Wgolf (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFF as shooting as not yet started. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/userfy. The problem that I found is that this film really hasn't gained any coverage in reliable sources to show that this passes WP:NFF, and the sources on the article aren't entirely useful. Most of them are unusable for notability, as they're either WP:PRIMARY sources or in WP:BLOG type places. That it hasn't yet started shooting also works against it. It's just too early for an article and it could probably be userfied, if someone wants to go that way. However I do have a strong suspicion that there's a bit of WP:COI here so I'd also recommend that if the original editor wants to userfy it, they should probably get someone from either WP:INDIA or WP:FILM to look over the article before placing it in the mainspace again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nepali:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Userfy As the film's production does seem to have coverage in multiple Nepali language sources (and a very few English-language ones), but mostly for the young age of its director and it being his first feature film.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Let it begin filming and we can have it back. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is a stub of Upcoming films, it can be accepted as an Wikipedia entry. There are multiple sources in English and huge coverage in Nepali, the movie seems to have noticeable space in the media. Though, we can take this down temporarily and bring it back as we find more news sources. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classicintl (talk • contribs) 11:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response to User:Classicintl: If you would like, the article can be placed into a user draft-space so you can work on it, expanding and sourcing as information comes forward, and seeking input on style, formatting and tone, with plans for an eventual return to article space. Read WP:PRIMER and study WP:RS and WP:COI. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am new on Wikipedia. I found these links on internet on this article and added texts. I saw Editswikifornepali starting this entry. PS: Here are sources in Nepali Languages: 1. http://www.nepalsandesh.com/2014/03/05/75325#sthash.6wazbgOC.gbpl 2. http://nepalpati.com/bff-film 3. http://nagariknews.com/entertainment/nepali-film/story/15928/15928 4. http://manoranjansansar.com/5369/%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%BF-%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%AB-%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%AB-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%89%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%88-%E0%A4%9F%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A8-%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B8/#.UyhAyc48GH0 5. http://www.filmykhabar.com/news/9091/ 6. http://www.nepalsandesh.com/2014/04/01/79600 7. http://www.namastefilmy.com/archives/2228 8. http://manoranjansansar.com/5723/%E0%A5%A7%E0%A5%AF-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%87-%E0%A4%AB%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%8F%E0%A4%B0-%E0%A4%A6%E0%A5%87/#.UzuW1-OunIU 9. http://www.onlinekhabar.com/2014/04/183506/ 10. http://nepalpati.com/nepali-movie 11. http://www.thuloparda.com/post/5017#sthash.1zSixcY0.dpbs 12. http://nepalkuwait.com/koselinews/kuwait/news.php?news_id=10515 13. http://nepal123.antvus.com/%E0%A5%A7%E0%A5%AF-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%87-%E0%A4%89%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%87-%E0%A4%AB%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE-%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%A8/ 14. http://www.filmyupdate.com/2014/04/4004.html

Sources in English: 1. http://showbiznepal.com/bff-best-friends-forever-enters-pre-production-stage-scheduled-to-begin-filming-this-spring/ 2. http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=72095 3. http://modishnepal.com/news_bbf/ 4. http://showbiznepal.com/bff/ 5. http://entertainment.bluzog.com/2014/04/06/nations-first-youngest-director-writer-pair-make-best-friend-foreverbff/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classicintl (talk • contribs) 12:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this Afd discussion now be closed since it has been 8 days. WP:AGF WP:FAITH WP:GOODFAITH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classicintl (talk • contribs) 17:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy per User:MichaelQSchmidt and User:Tokyogirl79. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.