The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BFL CANADA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable insurance broker. Few google news results. Essentially an advertorial. Risker (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TNT, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when it can be sourced properly. As written, this does indeed have some advertorial/PR shades to it (not blatant enough to warrant speedy, but definitely still present), and it's sourced almost entirely to primary sources, such as the websites of other organizations with which it has a direct affiliation and WP:ROUTINE paid-inclusion notices of executive staffing appointments in the business-section equivalent of the classifieds, with virtually no evidence of any real reliable source coverage about it in the journalism sections of newspapers or magazines. That's not the kind of sourcing it takes to get a company over WP:CORP regardless of how notable it may be in theory. Bearcat (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – run of the mill wikispam by WP:SPA. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a means of promotion. Citobun (talk) 11:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.