The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 22:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BF Chronicles

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently released book that has received no reliable coverage that would satisfy WP:NBOOK. Does not appear to meet WP:NBOOK guidelines in any way at this time.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Tokyogirl79[reply]

Comment. It should be noted that the author's page is also up for deletion at this time due to notability concerns.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete per nom. May be bad form as I nominated the author, but need to be consistent. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable book by a non-notable author. SL93 (talk) 22:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to author Charlye Monroe. If author's article is deleted then so will be the redirect, but until then it is the proper course to follow. Mice never shop (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Only problem with this is that the author's page was listed the day before this one was, so unless the page is held over for more discussion the author's page will be deleted before this one is.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.