The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rationale for Keep rather than no consensus; the delete arguments were indeed non-policy-based and WP:ATA, whereas there was one sound !vote to keep, and another which (while "Keep per X") was also guideline-based. ~72 hours after the second relist, this is about as good as it gets. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 07:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

B Positive Choir

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability criteria Natureium (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Not enough sources. VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 16:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per these news sources; I would also consider this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this to be suitable sources that could be used. I'll expand the article when I've got a mo. In the meantime, see arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 01:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The refs are trivial or marginal at best. It is a charity choir recently created to raise money from a song. I think they will disappear shortly and this is just 1 event material. Szzuk (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ritchie333; it's probably only ever going to be a stub, but it's gained easily enough third-party coverage to pass WP:GNG. Black Kite (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.