The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baden Eunson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:Too soon. Does not make WP:Prof#C1 on GS citation count. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Keep, he‘s a wellknown person in the business world with great reputation by his works in the fields of Communication skills and Organization development, especially as the author of Behaving – Managing Yourself and Others, Communicating in the 21st Century, Business Writing and Conflict Management. --Hoss (talk) 08:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but evidence is needed. I note that you are the creator and almost sole editor of this BIO. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Do you have a WP:COI in the matter? Xxanthippe (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

WP:NAUTHOR looked somewhat plausible to me, but I didn't find quickly find reviews of his books for it. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, in absence of reliable independent reviews for WP:NAUTHOR (which I did not find). Citation record is too weak for WP:NPROF C1, and I don't see evidence of other notability criteria, from NPROF or otherwise. The article originator claims the books are influential, but I don't see evidence for that in reliable sources. I'll watch the discussion, and will change my !vote if better sources are found. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if he was truly well known we would have a broad variety of sources about him, which we do not have. He fails to pass notability for either academics or writers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.