- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Also per G5, but this has also determined the subject is not notable at this time. SmartSE (talk) 10:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Balaji Loganathan (photographer)[edit]
- Balaji Loganathan (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One reliable source Time of India. Non-notable photographer. Marvellous Spider-Man 07:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable photographer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete He is a notable photographer. Nexabee (talk) 12:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete This article must not be deleted as the person is notable enough.43.239.68.87 (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete Balaji loganathan is a notable photographer.Zikolic (talk) 12:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ARTIST. I couldn't find any proper references beside one in Time of India and this is quite far from significant coverage. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note It is very likely that Nexabee and Zikolic are socks - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindcap. SmartSE (talk) 15:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Amazingly they are not, but they are obviously undisclosed paid editors and have both been blocked. This qualified for deletion via G5 IMO per WP:PROXYING, but since this discussion is ongoing, it may as well be left to run the full 7 days. SmartSE (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-Non-notable photographer.Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 11:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- do not Delete- notable photographer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.55.90.2 (talk) 09:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
*Do Not Delete- A Notable photographer. The Hindu is a good resource as India's national newspaper.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC) * Do not delete this article. Balaji is a famous photographer. TOI and The Hindu news links justify this statement.1.22.129.201 (talk)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.