The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Banchbo Sharad Samman

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG: non-notable award, no coverage from reliable sources. Esquivalience ^t 17:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inclined to delete because there's actually not much about this award, a News search found some results but nothing recent (mostly 2011-2013), searches at Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary found nothing while browser found some of the same links in News and the article aside from this Kolkata Today. I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no target. SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Google News is pretty poor for India, but I found a number of sources which look reliable, e.g. [1]. I'd love to see someone more familiar with the topic clean up the article - it's a mess right now. Pburka (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You'll notice your results are the same results I found. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.