The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bangkok Mass Transit Authority fleet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:FANCRUFT and original research. No sources (other than self published) to verify this is a notable topic Ajf773 (talk) 08:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Whilst digging I also found a second article that may be suitable for AfD - this will be done separately. Nightfury 09:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Merge with Bangkok MTA article? Seligne (talk) 04:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic is notable, as this is a substantial operator in that region and so covered in works such as Rikisha to Rapid Transit: Urban Public Transport Systems and Policy in Southeast Asia and Cities, Transport and Communications: The Integration of Southeast Asia Since 1850. Those works provide high-level analysis and history while detail is found in local coverage such as the Bangkok Post. Andrew D. (talk) 19:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrew Davidson, would you happen to know if any of those sources go into such detail as the models and registration numbers of the buses as the article currently does? --Paul_012 (talk) 02:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I find it hard to believe that such detail would be supported by the reliable sources mentioned above, and since I haven't received a response to the above query, I'll have to assume that the content is simply unverifiable. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.