The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, has not played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Must be given a chance to add reliable references as the club has won two league titles. Umair Aj (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability given. I could be convinced if some evidence were provided during this discussion, as @Umair Aj: suggests exists. You've got time. That's why these discussions run for a whole week. Smartyllama (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFOOTBALL as the club hasn't played in their national cup competition. Also fails WP:GNG. - YellowDingo(talk) 00:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.