The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Batgirl. No sure how it should be organized, but feel free to transfer necessary content at Batgirl. I will leave the sub-article with the merge tag on top and whether the merging is complet change the sub-article to a redirect JForget 13:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Batgirl (comic book)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for separate sub-article. Already sufficiently covered in the (excellent) article: Batgirl. New page adds nothing - not sourced - not categorized. Just no reason for it to stay. --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree in the Batgirl article it only shows info on Cassandra Cain and practicaly has three sentances talking about Stephanie Brown. So how does it cover this new paragraph? --Schmeater (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I overstated it, but I think (in my view, anyhow) it follows from that the the information in the AfD article can easily be included within the primary article rather than its own sub-article. --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Batgirl. I have raised concerns at Talk: Batgirl (comic book)#Needed? and more generally here, the emerging feel is that this seems unwise. I think the best bet is to collapse it back into the relevant section. Work on it there and if it seems to demonstrate independent notability then feel free to split it out. Bear in mind that this is the third Batgirl series and you can't just have an article on the most recent so you'll need to assemble resources for all three. Feel free to work on this on your sandbox if you want. (Emperor (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 03:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to batgirl Seems like a harmless article created by an editor who didn't know that we had a main article. Protonk (talk) 03:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like all the info in here added to the Batgirl article under Stephanie Brown if we are going to merge.--Schmeater (talk) 22:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made this article because I wanted there to be an article about everything in the aftermath of Battle for the Cowl, so if you do delete this article and merge it into Batgirl I would wan't everything at the bottom of the article. I have nothing to say about this article staying. --Schmeater (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added information about the previous series and well I hope I've added enough.--Schmeater (talk) 18:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a reason for the article to stay it is covered properly at the Batgirl article but that focus's too much on the person and not the comic. I wan't this article to focus on the series and not the person as much. --Schmeater (talk) 01:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Batgirl after a good sift. At least one section, "Oracle: The Cure", is not a comic book series titled "Batgirl" and is very out of place here. As for the rest... This almost feels like it wants to be an issue by issue plot summary dumping ground, some thing we don't need. As for porting all of this to Stephanie Brown (comics), I'd say "no". Almost all of it have zero to do with that character. - J Greb (talk) 03:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Batgirl--Amadscientist (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* Merge: to Batgirl - Ret.Prof (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have my attention Merge To Batgirl so get on with it delete the article! --Schmeater (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.