The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be with You (2009 film)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently not scheduled to go into production until 2011,and would thus violate WP:CRYSTAL (not my field, but I came across it in following up speedies) DGG ( talk ) 18:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Violates WP:CRYSTAL; not to mention the fact that the film appears to be dead in the water anyway.¡ǝıʞʞǝɹʇ ʇuǝıɔuɐ (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2009 film, going into production 2011? Come on.... Peridon (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Quite simply, even imdb took down its page for it. The article name is just factually wrong - there was no such film in 2009. So... And DGG: Thanks for putting the correct tag on the Vandalia films article! Hutch y2k (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's WP:CRYSTAL until the Fat Lady sings or principal photography begins! Eddie.willers (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Scheduled to enter production in 2011"... ¨¨ victor falk 05:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NFF, WP:CRYSTAL. Take your pick. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.