The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium-Kyrgyzstan relations

[edit]

Belgium has no embassy in Kyrgyzstan. Coverage is mainly about multilateral relations [1], French coverage even less coverage. [2] LibStar (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnotable relations between countres Arma virumque cano (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user's primarily contributions to Wikipedia have been to !vote (primarily delete) on dozens of AfDs approximately 1 minute apart from each other. See AN thread --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ["belgium+and+kyrgyzstan"&spell=1| This] doesn't happen very often. As for a search on Kyrgyzstan and Belgium, one item [3] from the state press agency in 2001. Mandsford (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the search, I'd like to see those who always vote keep try to rescue this...LibStar (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge despite pleas of helping merge these articles, nominator continues to noiminate new articles. I have already collected all of this information to merge, so this is a pointless empty gesture, an argument over a redirect, not an article. Ikip (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no argument here appears to me. LibStar (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since no reliable sources treat this relationship. There's no sourced content at all (barely any content period) so there is nothing that could be "merged." I have no objection to someone creating a redirect to whichever of the foreign relations of articles seems most relevant after this is deleted.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would oppose even a redirect in this instance. In order to have an article on a bilateral relationship, there needs to be one simple criteria: there should actually be a relationship. In this case, there just isn't! HJMitchell You rang? 23:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, random X-Y intersection article. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability for any of these. Most of them are just random combinations. Renaissancee (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. If someone comes along and votes Keep, I'll reconsider, but for now I've got to add the arguments already presented by others. Yilloslime ^T_C 22:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.