The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Zhou[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article written by SPA, who also contested a PROD on it. This is the version with the REFBOMBing cut down a bit. The RSes are articles about Bybit, and only mention Zhou himself in passing. Sources found in a WP:BEFORE about Zhou himself are largely self-sourced and promotional material, even in the crypto press. It's not clear Bybit passes WP:CORP either, or I'd suggest redirecting it there. As is, this should be deleted as apparent advertising - David Gerard (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, China, Singapore, and United Arab Emirates. David Gerard (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most possible sources look like churnalism about Bybit. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:B15A:4ECC:3C0E:728A (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources; searches return promotional coverage. Not independently notable outside of role in Bybit, for which no article exists. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 06:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The coverage I've been available to find has all been promotional stuff, press releases and such, nothing in-depth. There just isn't any in-depth WP:SIGCOV in WP:SECONDARY WP:RS. Jacona (talk) 12:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources about Ben Zhou (Chinese: 周本). The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. If Bybit had an article (which it currently does not), I would support redirecting there as suggested by the nominator. If Bybit is created in the future, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives for deletion, I would support undeleting this article's history under a redirect to Bybit to allow editors to use the content for a selective merge and to undo the redirect if Ben Zhou becomes notable.
Cunard (talk) 11:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
lol crypto. Delete. The company is more likely to have notability maybe in the future, but neither topics constitute GNG. SWinxy (talk) 06:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.