The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Don Cummings. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bent But Not Broken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. The only review in the article is a Kirkus Indie, which is a pay-for review program that does not demonstrate notability, see WP:KIRKUS. The only other review I can find is on the NY Journal of Books (Not to be confused with the much more famous NY Review of Books) which seems to be an obscure group blog. There's a passing mention of the book in this NYtimes article but it's not SIGCOV. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even sure the author is notable honestly. Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article isn't even tagged for notability, so that's not a compelling reason to not merge content there. Jclemens (talk) 05:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not objecting to the redirect proposal for now, I'm just saying that I think there may be a case for AfDing the author too. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.