The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per recent improvements. Closed early by SNOW.--Rifleman 82 (talk) 03:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benzamil[edit]

Benzamil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete no refs to show that this one liner article is about a notable drug. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Give the article a chance to be expanded, first. Over 10k Ghits, so it must be good for something. ArcAngel (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article could be incubated in user space - it's not ready for prime time. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I can't make heads or tails out of the potential sources, but it seems that someone who understood chemistry/drugs better than I do could easily expand this article. -Seidenstud (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, just needs more sources. --Dhartung | Talk 19:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, now its sourced and expanded!--Stone (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is a fair stub article. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep Could use some work, but looks a-ok notable. Editorofthewiki^{review my edits here!} 22:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Benzamil was studied for quite a few years as a possible treatment for cystic fibrosis, although results were ultimately disappointing. This could be a nice little article with some TLC. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. I hope I'm allowed to do this :) —Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Looks like TLC was provided -- the article bears no resemblance to the one that was nominated for deletion. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.