The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Non-admin speedy close of likely bad-faith nom. User:Horsenuked's only edits are to nominate this article for deletion. Please use your regular account if you want to nominate this. Mike R (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beverly Eckert

[edit]

Fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BIO1E, WP:NOT#MEMORIAL and WP:BIO. Horsenuked (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beverly Eckert seems like a reasonable article. I'd like to know more about her, and this seems like a good way to put things together. She seems to have been an effective voice in Washington. She is all over Google, even without the current incident. I vote to keep KellyCoinGuy (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Like KellyCoinGuy says, she was newsworthy prior to the incident of 2/12/09. Nonpoint74 (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She seems to have been notable even before the crash for her advocacy. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 17:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Her activism pertaining to 9/11 terrorist attack against the USA, has made her notable based on wikipedia rules and regulations. Tommy Nero Sullivan (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and close. Newsworthy before the incident as an activist for Sept. 11 families, met with the President, specifically mentioned in Obama's press conference. -- Irixman ^{(t) (m)} 17:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.