The result was Non-admin speedy close of likely bad-faith nom. User:Horsenuked's only edits are to nominate this article for deletion. Please use your regular account if you want to nominate this. Mike R (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BIO1E, WP:NOT#MEMORIAL and WP:BIO. Horsenuked (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Beverly Eckert seems like a reasonable article. I'd like to know more about her, and this seems like a good way to put things together. She seems to have been an effective voice in Washington. She is all over Google, even without the current incident. I vote to keep KellyCoinGuy (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Like KellyCoinGuy says, she was newsworthy prior to the incident of 2/12/09. Nonpoint74 (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She seems to have been notable even before the crash for her advocacy. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 17:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Her activism pertaining to 9/11 terrorist attack against the USA, has made her notable based on wikipedia rules and regulations. Tommy Nero Sullivan (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close. Newsworthy before the incident as an activist for Sept. 11 families, met with the President, specifically mentioned in Obama's press conference. -- Irixman (t) (m) 17:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]