The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bilal Enclave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A non-notable group of houses. CSD A7 is tempting, but doesn't apply to buildings or places. Google searches on both the English and Hindi names of the development in Google reveals very little, and there's little to indicate that this is more than a garden variety residential development. Prod has been vigourously contested by the original author of the page. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable enclave. No reliable sources could be found. Salih (talk) 07:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete insignificant group of houses, no sources, reads like spam. Hut 8.5 13:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is not notable, no substantial news coverage.--Ped Admi (talk) 19:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.