- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Moving to draft per consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bill Hutchens[edit]
- Bill Hutchens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ranges from press releases, "community contributor"s, and other non-WP:INDEPENDENT sources. Aside from possible WP:UPE, idependent/reliable sources here only mention Bill Hutchens per WP:ROUTINE. TLA (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The fact that he was in many films that have articles and references suggest that it should be kept. Bduke (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Per the criteria in WP:NACTOR he needs to have some leading roles, not any roles. All these roles could have been non-leading. I will see if I can do some further research in this and post a vote later. Royal88888 (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. after a review of his credits, I do not think he meets WP:NACTOR, but he meets WP:BASIC. In particular, these 2 articles here would work towards notability: Shokya.com and newexpressnews.com. Royal88888 (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to draft; the article indicates that he was "on the set" of a 2023 production, and had another in post-production, apparently, since 2019. If new coverage arises on the subject's involvement with either of these, the article can be submitted to restoration to mainspace. BD2412 T 01:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete refbombed spam lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. Probable UPE with a good chance of socking. Two sources mentioned above are rehashes of press releases so lack independence. Just being in films is not enough, needs significant roles. duffbeerforme (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.