The result was delete. No prejudice against a recreation with proper sourcing, if that's possible. W.marsh 16:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a poorly sourced, poorly written biography of a living person who appears to be some kind of conspiracy buff. I suggest that we clear up the sourcing concerns or delete it. --Tony Sidaway 05:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]