- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete or redirect !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 17:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Birgitte Bak-Jensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No clear indication of notability. Couldn't find any significant media coverage. PepperBeast (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw this nomination. I think I need to spend a bit more time on notability guidelines for academics. PepperBeast (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Media coverage is not usually a helpful metric for academic notability. Her Google Scholar profile shows 20 publications with over 100 citations each. Only one has her name in first position but several others list her last, usually also a meaningful position. I think this is enough for WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per David Eppstein. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NPROF C1, via plenty of highly-cited papers. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:PROF#C1 with a pretty high h-index and many publications with triple-digit citations. XOR'easter (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as PROF-C1, h-index of 39.--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 06:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clear pass of WP:NPROF - uncertain why this was even nominated. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Same conclusion as everybody else. My tuppence worth. scope_creepTalk 11:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.