The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blade Loki

[edit]
Blade Loki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This 1-sentence-of-text band article was PRODed under A7, as failing to reflect notability (it simply says the band exists). The PROD was removed, without any rationale at all being offered. It appears to lack notability under wp standards. Epeefleche (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Epeefleche (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could be wrong, but I believe that the source referenced in the article was written by the recording studio Blade Loki uses. That removes it's credibility because it is not a third party source. In addition, the information provided in that source is not sufficient to qualify Blade Loki as having met WP:BAND. Lord Arador (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.