The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Portland Trail Blazers#Team branding. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 23:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze the Trail Cat[edit]

Blaze the Trail Cat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources; highly specific topic that is unlikely to have many of them. Tezero (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to parent Portland Trailblazers article. This deserves about two sentences at the end of the parent article. Next? in the appropriate section of the parent article. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Portland Trail Blazers. Absent independent sources, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Portland Trail Blazers#Team branding. -- Whpq (talk) 06:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I missed the reference to the mascot buried at the bottom of the "Team branding" section. Looks like the mascot is covered at an appropriate level, so no substantive "merge" of content is required. Accordingly, I am changing my !vote above from "merge" to "redirect." Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Oddly enough, the coverage of Blaze in the Trailblazer's article is 2 sentences long. -- Whpq (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.