The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Knuckles (movie) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear notability, created by a blocked SPA with the goal of promoting Kasey Ryne Mazak. Calton | Talk 11:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 12:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 12:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- won a couple of vanity awards and hyper-localized recognition. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Judging by the coverage on horror-film websites that I wasn't sure were reliable enough to add—they have since been added as external links and removed, see this version—it's become a bit of a cult movie. In addition to the awards listed, I found it won a special effects award at the Austin film festival where it premiered, and I found a report on it in the Austin newspaper and a review on Fangoria, which I think we can use. In addition to the awards and those citations that I added, I don't think we should discount the cult coverage completely in assessing notability, so I believe it squeaks by. By the way, I was not informed by the nominator, and there may well be others with more knowledge of this kind of film who can help find usable sources and assess its notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the Fangoria review is an established reliable source for horror films as per WikiProject Film, also Austin Chronicle coverage and some of the reviews listed here although most in the list are unreliable but overall there is enough for WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 17:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Poorly written but does seem like a film that would fit WP:NOTABILITY with the awards won. However, I strongly advise that the article be improved. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 10:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.