The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bond 23 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There is no confirmed information on this film, period. Bond 22 is the next scheduled film, and information for that article is scarce as it is- Just as there is no page for the United States presidential election, 2012, it is jumping the gun to start writing about Bond 23. -- Wikipedical 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as nominator. -- Wikipedical 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as Daniel Craig is contracted for Bond 23, then it is a certain and worrents a page. 194.80.240.66 21:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a fan, this is premature. Due to the EON production schedule, though, it is entirely likely that verifiable information will be available significantly before the release of Bond 22. --Dhartung | Talk 22:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Indeed too premature. Just the fact that Craig is contracted for three films doesn't justify a whole article. The series will probably never be retired; might as well make pages for Bond 24, 25, 26 etc. if this one is left in. --Marcg106 22:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball SkierRMH,02:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wait until actual information about the film surfaces before creating a page. Brandon Rhea 02:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOT - Mig ^(Talk) 02:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete waaay too early Ealgian 02:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedical and Mig. Stormscape 02:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sr13 07:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ··· rWd · Talk ··· 07:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Even there is no conformation about Daniel Craig as 007.--Sina 07:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No information available on it whatsoever, we don't even know yet if they will make a 23. Ben W Bell talk 12:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to James Bond or similar page. I just reverted a redirect on the page that someone jumped the gun on while this AfD is in progress. TheRealFennShysa 19:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Who the hell..? This is definately jumping the gun. I don't even believe it has even been confirmed yet (or even rumored for that matter..)! And we are not having a page that simply says it's going to be a 2010 film starring Daniel Craig in it. I agree with the person above, it might be alright to mention it on the James Bond page but having a whole new article is just a waste of time.
• Delete. Craig is contracted for at least three films. However, there are no other details about this film, whether it's plot or casting decisions, let alone a release date. This page can be re-created when there are verifiable sources concerning its direction. --Madchester 22:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom. Barcode 16:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.