The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boo Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources and fails WP:ENT by miles. IMDb only has him listed for the beach party thing. The article has been deleted six times under this name as well as "Boo bailey". PROD contested by IP. Favonian (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete yet again as per nomination. This guy really can't let go of his childhood as a "star", can he? Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 22:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt, recreated Six times! this has to end Weaponbb7 (talk) 02:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I cleaned it up some, and sectioned it in encouraging improvements. I challange the author User:Yodude500 to actually show some notability. If he does so, I will reconsider my delete... but I was myself unable to do so. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt Non-notable actor, IMDb pages are not reliable sources, no independent sources, and IMDb isn't one. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh... it is generally accepted that IMDB list of actors for released projects is okay enough, since cast can be sourced directly to the released project itself. That said, and otherwise in agreement, his being in only one project fails WP:ENT, and lack of any coverage anywhere else puts the nail in the coffin. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per all above, lest there be any ambiguity remaining on this one. Evalpor (talk) 16:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Back several months ago, I declined an A7 speedy on this, but I heartily agreed with the subsequent prod. Given the determination to have an unsourced stub on this, salt would be delicious. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and re-salt. This has been deleted twice under this title, four times under the lower-case version of the title, and I thought a couple of times under a misspelling, but I'm not certain. I believe I PRODded this once before with a message like, "Non-notable child actor with one minor appearance in a straight-to-video production," and I certainly still agree with that assessment.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 03:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.