The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lorraine_Heggessey#Boom_Pictures. —Darkwind (talk) 04:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boom Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company that has been in existence for less than a year. No major productions AFAICT. Article is clearly to promote the company and probably should have been speedied. Note that company's logo is not trademarked and fair use but has been created by the author of the page. Barney the barney barney (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Lorraine_Heggessey#Boom_Pictures, but without deleting the page history. I'd declined the speedy because it wasn't blatantly and/or unambiguously promotional, but there is a definite problem with notability. I've found some articles talking about the company, but it might be a bit WP:TOOSOON for this to have an article just yet. So far everything that is in the article can be summed up at Heggessey's article. I'd hesitated before doing that in the hopes that someone would come up with more sources, but since she's the most visible face of Boom Pictures and the only one with an actual article, a redirect is probably the best option here. I have no problem with anyone userfying it and working on it until it passes notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.