The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (G11). fish&karate 10:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Botmetric[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG due to lack of substantial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Thoroughly promotional and unencyclopedic in tone. Rentier (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Oh god no. Barely even have to look at the references when they have "indianprwire" as a name..NOTPROMO too. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising; corporate spam on nn company with overload of puffery, external links and buzzwords. I requested a deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.