The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notable only for one event, essentially an obit entry or news item. Tragic, yes; but is it encyclopedic? Pastordavid (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a news item. There is no evidence of any widespread ongoing coverage or other impact that would justify an article. News search results appear to indicate coverage was fairly local. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notable only for a local news event. --L. Pistachio (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.