The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brielle Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:NMUSICIAN Ploni (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Television. Ploni (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Serial Thriller" charted in the top 50 of Australia's singles chart. That satisfies NMUSICIAN. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Although sections are copied/paraphrased from her official bio [1] and the whole thing needs a major rewrite. here is the Billboard bit mentioned. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify. Agree that meets Wikipedia:NMUSICIAN because of chart listing, however page as it stands is completely unsourced. Note that link to Brielle's website takes you to another person's website. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 04:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I've started the cleanup. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep With cleanup, should remain. Per Duffbeer. NiklausGerard (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Problems seem to have been resolved. // Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 21:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried looking up the sources cited and I have not been able to find even one. The sources are not hyperlinked and google searches do not turn up the articles cited. The way things stand, there are no independent sources and fails WP:GNG. PaulPachad (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have provided some more archived online sources. Try Trove at National Library of Australia for more.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep exercising WP:AGF multiple offline reliable sources coverage has been referenced in the article by an experienced editor and WP:NMUSIC criteria 2 is passed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable for charting single. Reliable independent sources provide substantial coverage. Clean-up and updating required but not reason for deletion.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep satisfies WP:MUSICBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.