The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted w/ a pinch 'o salt (with no prejudice to unsalting in a few years if they do meet WP:N) per G7. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broadway (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kingdoms (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This band and its album were speedy-deleted a few days ago, having been input as part of a promotional campaign by their "artist management label", see WP:COIN#User:Mcarter13, Artery Foundation and their clients, but here they are back again, and as the author is arguing against speedy deletion on the talk page I bring them here. The band have released this one album, which "never charted on the Billboard 200, or any of Billboard's charts, but is popular among reviewers". They are currently on tour as a supporting act. This does not meet the notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• "delete" fails WP:music. --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both Fails to demonstrate notability per WP:MUSIC. ukexpat (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt both – This seems a pretty clear-cut case. Rees11 (talk) 19:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The label is continuing to use Wikipedia to promote the band in order to make it notable, which is backward. The band shouldn't be on Wikipedia until it is already notable. -- Atama頭 19:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both and salt: per nom. Joe Chill (talk) 20:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Can't believe I'm saying this (as the author), but after noticing everything I did wrong with creating this article so soon before they got notable, I have to go with delete both. I really think this should be deleted after noticing all of the faults. I apologize, for I didn't notice the amount of previous deletions from both articles. I'll be sure to check more thoroughly next time, especially for lack of notability.Krazycev13 (talk) 01:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.