The result was Keep. Clear evidence has been cited both in the article and the discussion below that the topic meets WP:V and WP:N. A quick google search pulls up this SF Chron [1] report which notes that When "Firefly" was canceled, fans -- dubbed Browncoats in honor of the doomed-but-noble Independents -- campaigned to have it moved to another network. It devotes ten paragraphs to the fan network, and makes constant reference to that network as browncoats. The article itself also mentions a documentary, and a quick library search reveals a UK ref in "Hungry for the real Roman Cinema FILM OF THE WEEK" The Herald (Glasgow); Oct 6, 2005; HANNAH McGILL; p. 8. Whilst mention has been made of redirection, that's a discussion for another venue. Steve block in Hiding T 23:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating for deletion on the grounds that the article shows no evidence that the topic meets the primary notability crieteria or the specific criteria for a fictional topic. The article does shows several sources only one of which would seem to meet the criteria layed out in WP:RS (this is [2]). One source which contains a couple of paragraphs on the topic does not meet the depth of coverage requirements for inclusion set out in the guidelines. The other sources include fansites [3], [4] , [5], [6], forums [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], other wikis [12], [13], [14], deadlinks [15], [16], [17], [18] a blog [19] and a source which is clearly not independent of the subject [20]. The fictional meaning section section is an extended plot summary – which Wikipedia is not. The events section is a directory which Wikipedia also is not. All the information within the article that is cited and encyclopaedic is (or could easily be) included elsewhere at Firefly (TV series)#Fandom and Firefly (TV series)#Plot. Other information that cannot be sourced may be more suitable in one of the several other wikis that cover the topic. Guest9999 (talk) 16:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
:*Note - The above is the sole edit from that account (IP address). [[Guest9999 (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)]][reply]
--Boradis (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]