The result was delete all. Secret account 20:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The articles show no evidence of notability, there is no evidence of significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources (there are no secondary sources at all). Merging the pages together would likely also be inapproriate as there is no evidence that Locations of Kim Possible is a notable topic that has been covered by secondary sources. If the locations mentioned are important to the series then they should be mentioned in the article for the series (Kim Possible); Notability is not inherited (links to essay). WP:V states that "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." - no reliable, third-party sources are given in the articles and I think it is unlikely that any exist to be found.
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reasons:
Guest9999 (talk) 18:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]