The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I am a bit unimpressed by the arguments used (the debate here is basically a "it's not notable" v. "it's notable" contest), but there clearly is not a consensus for deletion here, and the argument given for deletion was superficial. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Busuu[edit]

Busuu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-Notable Website. Per3512 (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep From a quick google search it looks notable to me. Maybe the article needs a little bit of work though. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 08:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Hi. I started this article. I don't see why this is a non-notable website. Who determines which one is it and which one is not? I think this article is very relevant for Wikipedia not only for the company but for the busuu language reference too. In Europe busuu.com is a very notable website with steady growth.Lestaire (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.81.159.100 (talk) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.