The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional weapon - fails WP:GNG as no significant third party coverage in reliable sources. Content cannot be merged as the list of weapons in the series was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons. Anthem of joy (talk) 20:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the main article for this media property, List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons was deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons . 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The fictional weapon does not meet the general notability guideline, it is a plot-only description of a fictional work and the article is unreferenced so there is no verifiability to presume that anything is worth keeping. Jfgslo (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG no reliable sources, most hits on Yahoo are Wiki type projects. Also there is no real world aspect as described in WP:FICT. --wintonian ^talk 04:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find any non-trivial reliable source coverage. Probably better suited for a Wikia project. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No outside coverage, no notability, the article does not have any references and it should not be on wikipedia, a fan site maybe but not here if it can not meet the guidelines. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is not appropriate for Wikipedia. WP:NOT mentions the idea of weapons lists in terms of games, but it really is good advice for all toys and fiction. In general, these end up being WP:DIRECTORY style databases with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as WP:NOTPLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous consensus at similar AFDs (see above). But if this is disputed, it might be worth further clarification (and discussion if necessary) at WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.