- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
Procedural close, wrong venue. Not an article, so not suitable for AfD. I have also removed the speedy deletion tag, as it did not apply. If the nominator wishes they can take this nomination to WP:RfD. --MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- CLion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CSD protestested and I suspect the PROD would as well. Taking to AfD. Recently created and not a probable landing page. Product fails WP:GNG and probably won't ever meet it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Procedural close WP:RfD seems the appropriate venue, rather than having both concurrent (invalid) CSD and (invalid) AfD. Widefox; talk 18:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.