The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bakers Delight, where it is already mentioned. The article is unsourced and WP:CSD#G11 material. WP:NOR and WP:V, core policies, override the arguments for keeping, per WP:DGFA. Sandstein 08:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COBS Bread (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:CORP; only reference given is the company's homepage. PROD was contested in last October, tagged with notability concerns in last December, but no independent sources have been added since then. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as spam. Speciate 09:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - Looks like spam, but the company has some notability Corpx 15:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/Redirect to the Australian parent company. One or two sentences on that page should take care it. Speciate 17:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it's notable, just needs more references. --PEAR (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Corpx. Mathmo ^Talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.