The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If evidence of notability emerges in the future, an article from those sources can be created from those sources at that time.Rlendog (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSKA Tralee

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too short article, doubtful notability, no sources. --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 01:14, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - being "too short" is not a valid reason to delete. No evidence of notability is. Giant Snowman 12:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As Snowman has already stated, due to the changeable nature of Wikipedia, the content of an article does not have any bearing on whether or not it meets our inclusion criteria. That being said, there is no evidence that this article does. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability. – Pee Jay 17:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable team. Argyle 4 Life^talk 22:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely unsourced article, and we don't even have an article about the league this team is reported to play in. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perhaps there is no evidence of notability now, but in a certain period of time there may well be. From my search of this club on the web, they seem to be a well-organised group of young men, without huge experience in the use of wikipedia, trying to publicise their team. Deleting this page will be further evidence of elitism creeping into the everyday life of Wikipedia.Smithy11 (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)smithy11 — Smithy11 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and does not exist for people to use to promote their team (or anything else for that matter). And subjects need to be notable now to have an article, the possibility that they might theoretically become notable at some unspecified point in the future is not sufficient -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.