The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7 nonnotable webcontent, likely g3 hoax, article on (14-year-old) director deleted as a7 for lack of assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Call of Duty (2010 film)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources, doesn't even have an IMDB listing. Based on the DVD cover it may be an unauthorized derivative work purporting to be based on the Call of Duty video game series--the cover says, "the famous game turns into a feature film series". (Numerous news sources can be found discussing the possible production of a film based on the video gane, but none of them mention this no-budget project or its creative personnel.) As such, maybe this should be a candidate for speedy delete, although I am not sure if it fits any of the specific criteria. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, unverifiable, no evidence of notability. (Note: the author of the article has a history of creating articles with no evidence of notability, several of which have been deleted, and others are subject to AfD now. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Rooster: Star Trek and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dreamer (2010 film).) All or most of these articles relate to Project Rooster, the article on which was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project rooster. This looks very much like advertising.) JamesBWatson (talk) 10:06, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally unsourced and the alleged DVD cover has numerous typographic errors. Looks to be nothing more than a hoax.--Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 17:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as another Project rooster G3 hoax. "Thomas Gardner films" does not exist anywhere outside of Wikipedia,[1] nor does Project rooster. The photoshop work on creating his DVD cover is quite creative... but reflects wishful thinking and not reality. And yes, while there were reports in 2009 that Activision/Blizzard was considering a film called based upon the video game and to be called Call of Duty,[2] THIS article is not it. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as G3, hoax. There's no such film outside Wikipedia, I couldn't find any reliable sources to prove its existence. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.