The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Note that the one "keep" !vote is by a confirmed sock puppet of User:Zingostar with the other just a copypaste. MuZemike 22:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cameta Camera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(({Delete. zero ghits, non notable))} Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per minimum establishment of notability per sources.--Judo112 (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete. This is just a advert for a business. The nobibility is from a business magazine which promotes success and is not an neutral view RichardLowther (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per minimum establishment of notability per sources

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confused Just what is the notability? It's a business that grew larger when it went online. Nothing special or notable in that - lots of other business have done the same but don't have a wikipedia page. RichardLowther (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable camera shop. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.