The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Somehow it reminded that we have went through this kind of debate before... - Mailer Diablo 04:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a very heavy vandalism magnet (WP:NOT a discussion forum), and the original version is an advertisement and a copyvio of an old version of the camp's website. I think the camp could have an article, but this isn't it. Given the amount of vandalism the article has received, I believe a history deletion is necessary. Coredesat talk! 01:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Hello32020 01:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Húsönd 01:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Camp Ramah. --Metropolitan90 03:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since Camp_Ramah#Ramah_North_American_Overnight_Camps list some other specific camps with seemingly (to me) solid content, I think we should delete and await creation of a non-copyvio (previous or otherwise) entry. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Reads like an advert. Title is ridiculous too. +Fin- 13:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. What's wrong with the title? That's what this camp is called. [1] --Metropolitan90 03:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of notability to the standards of either WP:ORG or WP:CORP, and I can't tell which applies. GRBerry 01:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment—If we delete this one we might need to consider the entire set:

• Camp Ramah in California
• Camp Ramah in Muskoka
• Camp Ramah in New England
• Camp Ramah (Wisconsin)

Myself, I’m borderline on the set of them, but lean toward deleting them all except the parent article. Integrate the important material into the main article. Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 04:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.