The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Campfire Legends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game, fails WP:GNG. Metacritic has zero reviews, critical or user, for any of the three games denoted here. WP:VG/S search comes up with nothing but database entries, with one exception: GameZebo. GameZebo has reviews and walkthroughs for each of the three games, yet no other publications seem to have a whisper about it. GameZebo also ran a promotion for their forums to give away free copies of the game. That means each individual game has exactly 1 source of in-depth significant coverage from our vetted reliable sources. -- ferret (talk) 00:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 00:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Adventure Gamers [1] is genre specific, but a RS, per here [2] Oaktree b (talk) 00:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Oaktree b That's a database entry. There's no review or coverage there, just a boilerplate plot summary. -- ferret (talk) 00:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Correction, there is review buried in this big compilation article, but that's still 1 review/publication for two of the games, and 2 reviews for the third game. -- ferret (talk) 00:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Here's Gamezebo, which is RS [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I explicitly mentioned GameZebo in my nomination statement. -- ferret (talk) 00:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete One, or even 2 reviews for each game is not enough to satisfy GNG, and only one of the games has 2 reviews. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A usual yardstick of notability is for a game to have review coverage from three different independent reliable sources under WP:VG/S. This game has two. That the page is really combining three titles into one is suggestive that there is not enough coverage to establish notability. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.